I’m Not a Lumberjack and I’m Not Really OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Back

Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack

Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks do not carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.

Axing For Trouble

The first of these two tales of violence happened in a village club in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some unsuspecting slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.

The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video websites that are streaming where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.

After blowing down vapor, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but perhaps not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either it was an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these specific machines. When coping with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.

The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.

‘ He comes in here all the right time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of money. He could be a laborer and only works any now and then.’ evidently, this is certainly one worker whom keeps their equipment that is own handy.

‘He’s normally a tremendously man that is quiet. He just stepped in really calmly by having an axe and smashed all the devices. There were a few customers by them at the time and they were terrified,’ he included.

As a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for 6 months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing more than a slap on the hand.

But Wait, There’s More…

The second of those two tales is a bit more frightening, since the axe was wielded not during the slots, but at a member of the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.

Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’

Before raiding the till and making down with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or even worse if he didn’t comply.

A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both using ski masks, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm in the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant because of the tree-chopping weapon.

The frightened store assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of cash,’ while the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a third suspect.

Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive regarding the scene.

Whose Casino Can It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out

The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan

While every of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight over the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposal that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.

Voting Rights

The appropriate option is pertaining to the theory that neighboring communities could be suffering from casino projects, but won’t have a chance to vote on whether those casinos should really be opened in the beginning. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, has been one of the handful of applicants who have recommended that most of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that could be positioned in East Boston, for example.

When it comes to the proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it would have on many Boston areas.

‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one community,’ Conley said during a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed advantages.’

In line with the state laws that produced the chance for three new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually obtain a vote on whether or not to allow the projects to be built. However, casino designers are required to negotiate compensation, with arbitration needed if the casinos and governments that are localn’t arrived at a resolution on their own.

Conley has proposed taking a path that isn’t really outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power on the entire vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.

Yay or Nay?

A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the entire city to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% had been in favor of the casino, while 37% opposed it.

Even when voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii as the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.

Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO

Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation

Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the activities book cookie jar after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired leading activities betting company CEO.

Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation

As a wagering store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the large donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.

Since Gala Coral Group is one associated with the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.

Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the local roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to control the number of betting shops.’

‘we understand there is concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with betting shops and pay day loan organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a written report to local voters earlier this year.

‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says a very important factor in public areas and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very uncommon for the politician.

Spared for a Technicality

However, fighting back the corner associated with Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna stated that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a individual capacity, and was accepted in respect with the guidelines and correctly declared.’

Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.

Even though Goulden is no longer mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.

Whether it is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or not the Conservative Party may just be searching to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this type of hard stance against the spread of the industry in https://casinopokies777.com/royalvegas-casino/ his regional constituency.

‘ The only thing we know he undoubtedly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.

Umunna, who is thought to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year their workplace was accused of modifying his Wikipedia page to exhibit evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.