California Legislators Continue to Grapple with Gambling Options

California lawmakers will mull several state bills that could affect both land and online gambling efforts this year (Image: Michael Macor, The Chronicle)

A fresh California gambling bill approved last week by the State Senate could up taxes and review regulatory procedures on the Golden State’s ever-expanding gaming industry. Introduced by Sen. Leland Yee (D-San Francisco), SB 601 will go under the microscope of the gaming policy advisory committee comprised of both industry executives and members of the public, using the goal of determining whether or not the current regulatory structures that are in place are aiding or abetting California’s current and future financial outlook.

Regulatory Review

Furthermore, the panel will review the effect of their state’s numerous card groups on both state and tax that is local, aswell as on costs to both. Yee said he’s checking out the possibility that more gaming that is non-Indian could help improve California’s ever-struggling coffers to become fuller.

‘Despite the good news we’ve seen in budget projections, I do believe it’s always worth taking a look at new revenue sources for our state,’ noted Yee. Once the committee review is complete, the new bill will move ahead to the state Assembly for further assessment.

Of course, as Newton so sensibly noted, for every single action there is a similar and equal reaction, and nowhere does that hold truer than worldwide of gambling legislation. No sooner had been SB 601 delivered to light than the Ca Coalition Against Gambling Expansion (CCAGE) popped up, declaring that the brand new bill ended up being absolutely nothing more but a gateway drug for loosening regulatory procedures for operators.

‘SB 601 should be amended to require a balanced examine the legal guidelines regulating gambling, including perhaps not just their impeding influence on the industry, however the social and economic expenses inevitably related to gambling expansion among California families and communities — e.g., increased debts, foreclosures and bankruptcies, divorces, suicides, etc.,’ said CCAGE in a letter to legislators in regards to the bill.

Many Viewpoints, Little Agreement

Of course, Ca has a many factions and viewpoints in terms of gambling, therefore SB 601 is hardly the only legislation on the table in this arena at this time. Also under review are SB 678 introduced by Sen. Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana) also referred to as the ‘Authorization and Regulation of online Poker and Consumer Protection Act of 2013,’ a bill targeted at legalizing poker that is online, which has the help of eight Indian tribes.

Then there is SB 51 the ‘Web Gambling Consumer Protection and Public-Private Partnership Act of 2013’ introduced by Sen. Roderick Wright (D-Inglewood). Of program, having been found bad on eight counts of perjury and voter fraud week that is last Wright may have more to worry about than gambling legislation right now.

With 38 million residents to draw from, Ca holds by far the promise that is most of any U.S. state to produce a lot of money from on the web gambling. In reality, a recent study conducted jointly by the marketplace research firm PokerScout along side consulting company Academicon revealed the Golden State has a $263 million revenue potential for the very first 12 months of iGaming, should it choose legalize it, and a $384 million possibility for year 10. That being said, other states such as Delaware have proved to be pretty far aristocrat indian dreaming slot machine download off in their projections that are initial far, but with California’s huge populace base, there’s far more prospective for hitting the mark or close to it in these projections.

Steve Wynn Joins Sheldon Adelson in Anti-Online Gambling Stance

Who woulda thunk it? Sheldon Adelson and Steve Wynn are now actually aligned in their anti-online gambling viewpoints (Image: msn.com)

They state politics makes for strange bedfellows, and the same could additionally be said for the casino industry. Of course, the lines between politics and gambling industry regulatory policy can get pretty blurry, and sometimes it’s difficult to discern one from the other, and such would be the case with all the new expert romance between longtime anti-online gambling crusader Sheldon Adelson, and their new bestie and ally, Steve Wynn.

Macau Is Their Relationship

Perhaps their mutual success in Macau has established a new bond for the two casino magnates; whatever it really is, Adelson and Wynn undoubtedly two of the most established visionaries in the gambling industry have now additionally become aligned in an area where Adelson has found few company compadres to join him: his vehement fight against what he claims are the inherent evils of online gambling in America.

Steve Wynn now says he concurs because of the vegas Sands CEO that Web gaming could be the apocalypse for underage morality into the U.S. if it gets a unilateral federal pass.

‘I end up agreeing with Sheldon,’ said Wynn recently.

This will be quite a turnaround from the Steve Wynn who once predicted that Sheldon Adelson would eventually heat up to the concept of online video gaming. Au contraire; it seems it comes to the Internet’s potentially corrupting influence via online gambling that it is Wynn who has now seen ‘the light’ when.

Visions of Underage Online Gamblers

Wynn now refers to your government that is federal ‘insatiable appetite for revenue,’ and foresees we’re uncertain why exactly the likelihood of underage gamblers by the truckload sneaking through the regulatory checkpoints and also this creating some types of American backlash towards gambling as a whole. Due to the fact there have actually certainly been incidents of underage gamblers engaging in land casinos beneath the radar at various points in time and the casinos usually get caught and fined for it without Joel Osteen developing a Sunday pulpit commentary on the subject or pickets increasing on the Las Vegas Strip this seems a bit dramatic to us; but that’s Wynn’s story and he is sticking to it.

‘This is not a good opportunity that is entrepreneurial’ maintains Wynn. ‘ Where is the business opportunity? The big problem I see is I don’t see the government letting us keep the money.’

Again, we are maybe not yes what evidence he has that 13-year-olds by the boatloads will be crashing online gaming web sites, but this generally seems to be Wynn’s primary concern and focus. He claims that after viewing the latest technological software at sites run by UltimateGaming et al to theoretically block underage players, he is simply not convinced they are sophisticated enough to keep kids a bay. Despite the IT teams telling him the sites is going to be inaccessible to kids, Wynn’s reaction was, ‘I’m sure it was impressive if you’re a guy that is cyber. But it ended up being bullsh—.’

Wynn now seems to be up to speed with Adelson’s contention that young teens will work out how to get online and gamble away all their own or their moms and dads’ savings. We’re not sure how sophisticated your combo of con and penetration that is high-tech would have become to pull that off; and while it’s without doubt a potential scenario, so has been hit by a car as soon as we drive, but that does not keep us from getting behind the wheel every time. Establishing policy predicated on worst-case scenarios seems like an odd tactic to us, but exactly what do we all know; we’re maybe not billionaires with effective land casinos in the U.S. and Macau, are we?

As for Wynn, it’s a definite maybe in their viewpoints with this for the present time, anyway. And besides his concerns about underage issues, he is maybe not sure he wants to attempt to transfer their upscale casino image up to a computer screen, and sometimes even how that would be doable.

‘ I don’t understand how to complete that on a screen that is 17-inch’ he said.

‘It’s possible it might alter,’ Wynn added, regarding his views on Internet gambling. But he doesn’t think anyone’s opinion will change Congress’s deer-in-headlight stance on Internet gambling, irrespective.

‘[Legal gambling passage] can not cope with the homely house of Representatives,’ he revealed. ‘They can not agree on anything, especially one thing this esoteric.’

2014 Florida session that is legislative Away from Gambling Expansion

The 2014 Florida legislative session now seems to be shying away from any focus on gambling although it looked hopeful last year.

Within the year that is last there’s been plenty of talk about changing the gambling rules that dictate how gaming is run in Florida. There were phone calls to grow the state’s casino offerings, along with plenty of help for reforming the current laws to remove loopholes and clarify what is legal for operators to offer. But despite every one of the issues that are important the table and even though the entire year is in its incipiency it seems that the chances of any gambling laws passing in Florida in 2014 are getting longer by the day.

Republican Retreat

That news employs Republican legislative leaders had pledged to help make the problem a priority year that is late last. Gambling ended up being on a list of legislative priorities that lawmakers presented to reporters before the present session began, but who now say so it’s unlikely any such thing will happen before some big steps happen.

House Speaker Will Weatherford said that his chamber would not work with no legislation to arrive concert with a constitutional amendment that would allow voters to weigh in on any feasible gambling expansion.

‘I don’t think you’ll see us taking up gaming in the House,’ the Speaker said unless we can do that. For Weatherford, that statement covered ‘anything new,’ presumably including regulatory changes, along with the help of brand new gambling enterprises.

Legal actions Add to Delays

The prospect of legislation may have been hampered by the nearly two dozen lawsuits currently facing the continuing state after studies and hearings were held to review their state’s gaming legislation.

Those lawsuits cover a number of issues, including regulations on horse and dog racing where battles over how races are conducted and whether tracks can host slots and other casino games were raging for some time now.

‘There’s regulations. There’s dogs. There’s integrated resorts. There is taxes. There’s slots. There’s the compact. There’s decoupling. There’s injury reporting. Invest the all those pieces of the puzzle, they don’t snap together that easily,’ stated Senate Gaming Committee Chairman Garrett Richter.

That compact could fundamentally prove to be the biggest issue on the table. Florida’s compact with the Seminole Tribe expires in 2015, and that deadline will ultimately make video gaming come through to the legislative agenda whether lawmakers are ready for it or perhaps not. The compact allows the Seminole Tribe to have exclusive rights to banked card games like blackjack throughout the state in exchange for $1 billion in payments from the tribe over the course of five years at the moment. Renewing or proposing modifications compared to that lightweight will be a issue that is contentious especially if Florida thinks it can make more by detatching the exclusivity and allowing non-Indian casino designers to build into the state.

‘Gaming is an problem that is forced to your state either this year or next year by the Seminole compact is up for some renegotiation and whenever you do this you type of touch the dominos that make the rest affected,’ stated Senate President Don Gaetz. ‘ I don’t genuinely believe that expansion of gaming or gaming legislation could be a Will Weatherford or perhaps a Don Gaetz concern.

‘It’s not something we necessarily want to be tangled up in,’ Gaetz said, ‘but it’s something that circumstances probably need either us or our successors to do some worthwhile thing about.’

Menu