Las Veg<span id="more-15237"></span>as Sands NFL Stadium Bid Gathers Steam

Sheldon Adelson (right) with Oakland Raiders owner Mark Davis. LVS wants to bring NFL to Las Vegas with a $1.2 billion stadium.

The Las Vegas Sands’ bid to woo a major sports group to Las Vegas with a proposed $1.2 billion stadium may only be a few weeks old, but it is already gathering energy.

In accordance with the Las Vegas Review-Journal (LVRJ), Ed Roski, who has the Majestic Reality Company that has partnered with LVS in the project, met with Nevada’s top development that is economic to go over the arena this week. Steve Hill is chairman regarding the Southern Nevada Tourism Infrastructure Committee, body, by all reports, with the energy to approve $1.2 billion stadiums.

Hill’s committee will formally hear the proposition month that is next on March 24th, and can issue a recommendation by July 31st.

LVS wants to build the stadium that is 65,000-seat a UNLV-owned 42-acre plot north of McCarran airport terminal. The college recently purchased the land for $50 million, and the stadium would become the home associated with UNLV university football team.

No NFL Prohibition on Las Vegas

LVS is hoping that it will also get to be the true home associated with Oakland Raiders, a team searching for a stadium. The Raiders’ rent expires in the Oco Coliseum in Oakland next month. LVS Chairman Sheldon Adelson met Raiders owner Mark Davis recently to discuss the possibility.

Right after that meeting, a memo was circulated by the NFL to its franchisees instructing them how they should react to press inquiries about Adelson’s approach.

In accordance with the memo, the official line is that ‘there is no prohibition under league rules on a team going to any specific city,’ suggesting that the presence of legal sports betting in Nevada would not influence Las Vegas’ chances in the light of the league’s strict anti-gambling stance.

Even though many Sin City residents would welcome the idea of a major sports team making the city its home for the first time, numerous are less excited about the usage of public money to fund such a project.

Public Money Would Provide Bulk of Funding

And while Adelson insisted that he would place up the ‘lion’s share’ of the costs, on closer inspection, this doesn’t seem to be the case. a financing that is preliminary calls for $780 million in public money, while LVS will pony up $420 million, although this plan isn’t final, says LVS.

Things seem to be moving quickly. LVS Senior Vice President of Government Relations Andy Abboud told the Review-Journal week that is last the company would be ‘moving ahead with the stadium concept with or with no NFL team,’ but he may be getting in front of himself.

Regardless any general public backlash over the funding derivation, UNLV Regent Michael Wixom told the LVRJ that the stadium still needs to be authorized by the university board.

‘While a stadium was discussed by some at the time being a use that is possible the property, the board have not authorized any stadium plans. Neither is there any agreement with any ongoing party for the construction or development of a stadium,’ he said.

Brand New Hampshire Voters Choose Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump in First-in-the-Nation Primary

Bernie Sanders, right, and Donald Trump are leaving New England over the top of the respective primaries after New Hampshire voters heavily favored the Democrat and Republican 2016 presidential contenders. (Image: Joe Raedle/Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Pictures)

New Hampshire voters spoke loud and clear on Tuesday with America’s first primary that is presidential of 2016 cycle. Just What they said is the fact that they’ren’t looking for the conventional candidate to be their next president, aside from party.

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, and Republican billionaire businessman Donald Trump, each won their respective primaries with decisive wins.

Sanders received 60 percent of the Democratic vote to Hillary Clinton’s 38.3 per cent, while Trump pounced his challengers with 35.2 percent to Ohio Governor John Kasich’s 15.8, Texas Senator Ted Cruz’s 11.7, and Florida that is former Governor Bush’s 11.1 percent.

It had been a dominating evening for Sanders and Trump, and both required the landslide victories to retain their energy because they now head to sc and Nevada.

‘ We will make America great again!’ Trump declared uttering his campaign motto.

‘Tonight, with what appears to be a record-breaking voter turnout, due to a huge voter turnout, and I say huge, we won,’ Sanders said, mimicking the way Trump says ‘huge.’

Billionaire Battle

Clinton wasted virtually no time in releasing a statement on Tuesday night that said her campaign is anticipating to March, where states with a more minority-centered demographic will participate. She additionally admitted she needs to do more to connect with younger voters, as Sanders, who ironically is the oldest candidate running in either celebration at 74, is dominating the youth vote. Clinton is 68.

Sanders’ rising popularity could entice billionaire Michael Bloomberg to enter the race. The former nyc mayor has expressed interest in running and recently unveiled he’s monitoring main results. Bloomberg, worth a reported $39 billion, may likely run being an independent.

Many political pundits believe Clinton is an at-risk candidate these days, due to her ongoing email scandal. Sanders continues to be perceived being a long shot in the general election, due to his socialist governmental views. That’s why continued strong results from Sanders are likely the key to Bloomberg throwing his title in to the ring.

A billionaire vs. billionaire 2016 presidential showdown would certainly make for an interesting election with Trump’s national popularity and stable polling numbers.

Prospect Casino

If gambling is an important issue in determining which candidate will receive your vote, here’s a rundown on the key contenders for 2016.


Hillary Clinton: The former Secretary of State has been mixed on video gaming. She publicly opposed casino development during her spouse’s governorship in Arkansas back in 1984, and then supported such development while a senator in brand New York. Clinton also voted and only the Internet that is unlawful Gambling Act (UIGEA) in 2006, the bill that outlawed the transmission of money online for gambling purposes.

Bernie Sanders: The Vermont politician hasn’t revealed much on their gambling position, though he too voted in favor of UIGEA.


Donald Trump: Trump was as soon as in the casino business in Atlantic City with several properties, but bailed from it ahead of the New Jersey gaming city began to sink financially. He is verbally gaming that is pro both land-based and online, but as he’s never held a governmental office, he does not have a voting record.

Marco Rubio: The Florida Senator is championing the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in Congress this year, the bill that could effectively block all types of gambling online, and it’s really rumored that he might have Sheldon Adelson’s support, although that’s still undeclared.

Ted Cruz: The Texas senator’s primary focus is working against congressional ‘cronyism,’ and the evangelist conservative would likely oppose bills like RAWA that extend the scope of federal government.

DraftKings Enters UK Market, Secures EPL Team Sponsorship

Arsenal’s Chief Commercial Officer, Vinai Venkatesham (left) with DraftKings’ Chief Executive Officer, Jason Robins, on the announcement of the commercial sponsorship contract between the 2 brands. (Image:

Daily fantasy sports (DFS) operator DraftKings rolled away its much-anticipated UK operations this week, 1st period of a expansion plan which will see the Boston-based start-up move into selected markets in Europe, Asia, and Latin America in 2016.

The move happens the heels of months of debate in the US, with state attorneys general and legislatures battling it out for or against DFS.

In July of last year, the daily dream sports market leader surely could raise almost $300 million to help finance its worldwide aspirations, $150 million of which arrived from Fox Sports for an 11 % stake in the business.

The UK platform is now real time, with players free to compete in 11 sport that is different, including American activities leagues like the NFL and NBA. However, DraftKings states it’s only too aware that Premiere League soccer will be the main draw.

Arsenal, Liverpool, Watford Sponsorship

As such, it has widened the scope of its soccer product for great britain market, broadening the scoring range to incorporate 18 different in-game activities, rather than the somewhat limited ‘goals,’ ‘saves’ and ‘assists’ categories of its past providing.

DraftKings also announced that it had guaranteed partnership that is commercial three Premier League groups, in Arsenal, Liverpool and Watford, that will begin to see the business brand presence throughout the causes during domestic events. DraftKings may also be promoted through each one of the teams’ digital and social media channels.

‘We’re under no impression which our top three activities here will not be anything else than football, football and football,’ stated Jeffrey Haas, an online gambling industry veteran, previously of PokerStars and, who’s got been brought in to oversee the expansion. Haas called the British ‘a logical fit’ for DraftKings.

American ex-pats could be confused on US soil is referred to as ‘football’ in England if they play on DraftKings across the pond, because what’s called ‘soccer.

Troubles at Residence

DraftKings announced it had received a license to run in 2015 august. Since then, times have now been trying for the business in america, as a lawsuit launched by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman seeks to shut its operations down in the Empire State, its biggest market.

The company had planned to launch in December of a year ago, but turmoil that is domestic nyc and other states postponed the move, as the company’s appropriate troubles mounted.

The company applied for a gambling license just like any other operator while in New York, DraftKings’ lawyers argue that its contests should be exempted from state gambling laws on the grounds that they are skill-based and not gambling games, in the UK.

This may be seized upon by opponents of DFS being an admission by the industry that the games are because much gambling as activities gambling is, but inaddition it suggests a willingness of this largely self-regulated industry to embrace regulatory oversight where such oversight exists.