Chauffer Suspect in Murder of Taiwanese Mogul Shih Chia-chin

Hsieh Yuan-hsin may be the main suspect in the kidnapping and murder of Shih Chia-chin. (Image: Taiwan police)

Taiwanese online gambling ringleader Shih Chia-chin may never be a household name in the web community that is betting but he had been infamous in his home country for the wealth he obtained by running his web sites. Now, their murder and kidnapping have surprised the area country. Shih’s human anatomy was discovered evening in Tainan County by police sunday. He was allegedly murdered after being kidnapped by his chauffeur and a few others on August 18.

Chauffeur Abducted Shih at Airport

On that day, Shih was picked up at the airport that is taoyuan Taiwan by their chauffeur, Hsieh Yuan-hsin. Just three hours later, the accountant at Shih’s company received a phone call saying that Shih had been kidnapped and demanding a ransom of TW$50 million ($1.67 million). Shih’s family attempted to negotiate with the kidnappers, eventually agreeing to wire TW$30 million ($1 million) to three bank that is separate.

When the family nevertheless didn’t hear from Shih, they contacted the police for assistance later that day. Hsieh apparently made a make an effort to withdraw the transferred ransom soon thereafter, but fled when he was asked to provide identification during the bank.

Hsieh Flees to Thailand

Despite efforts from prosecutors who issued a warrant to bar him from leaving the country, Hsieh managed to board a flight to Thailand just hours later making use of a fake passport that used his photo but their cousin’s name and details. Hsieh was spotted on airport CCTV footage on 18 august.

Based on the United Daily News, police noted that Hsieh didn’t have a criminal history, which made them suspect that another individual may have prepared the kidnapping. He did, but, seem to be covering their tracks, as he had used his passport that is real to a journey to Hong Kong. The passport that is fake been annulled, and Hsieh is suspected to remain in Thailand. Nonetheless, authorities fear he could flee to Cambodia or Myanmar, and Thai police have actually been expected to help into the investigation.

They also suggested that ransom may possibly not have been the motivation that is primary the crime. Hsieh fled the nation without recovering the ransom, and a watch that is valuable still on Shih’s body when it had been found.

According to a report from the Central Information Agency (CNA), a human play lightning link slot online body was found in a mountainous area of tainan County with more than 20 puncture wounds towards the back regarding the evening of August 24, about a week after the kidnapping occurred. Shih’s family was called in to recognize the physical human body, and confirmed it was him.

Two Other Suspects in Custody

While Hsieh has not yet been apprehended, two other suspects were arrested on Monday. Full names are not available, but The China Post said that their surnames were Lin and Cheng. According to authorities, Lin confessed to being a section of the kidnapping plot, but advertised that he did maybe not know such a thing about plans to murder Shih. The two accomplices were identified surveillance that is using, which revealed they had abandoned Shih’s vehicle in Greater Tainan.

Nine years ago, authorities cracked straight down on Shih’s Internet gambling band. That triggered an 18-month suspended prison term for the person whose fortune ended up being apparently worth billions of brand New Taiwan Dollars. Reports say that Shih had recently been the victim of the kidnapping attempt four years earlier in the day.

PokerStars Should Wait to Enter US Markets, Says 888 CEO

888 CEO Brian Mattingley believes PokerStars must certanly be allowed straight back in the US, but should face a short period that is exclusionary. (Image:

PokerStars and 888 Poker are natural competitors, as the companies are two of this biggest players in today’s internet poker industry. PokerStars is by far probably the most well-known online poker site on the planet these days, which may be why 888 CEO Brian Mattingley has previously said that letting the Amaya-owned poker brand right back into the US would help all companies, by attracting more players for everyone to share. But now, Mattingley has started walking right back those comments a bit, at least with regards to allowing PokerStars free entry into lucrative American states.

According to an interview between Mattingley and Bluff Magazine‘s Steve Ruddock, the 888 CEO still thinks that PokerStars is beneficial to the entire poker that is american, and claims he welcomes their return. However, he does think they should get at least a slap on the wrist before they’re let back in that they gained an unfair advantage by continuing to service players in the US after the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) went into effect, and that as a result.

Statement Appears to Contradict Earlier Stance

This might be a little different from reviews published by the Las Vegas Review-Journal (LVRJ) is June. In an interview with that paper’s Howard Stutz, Mattingley had been quoted as saying that he wanted to see PokerStars come back to the United States just as possible.

‘It is like unleashing a 800-pound gorilla into the market, but having more players on a regulated site would gain everyone,’ he said.

‘ We contend with PokerStars throughout Europe,’ Mattingley said of his largest rival. ‘They are a definite competitor that is formidable. But they would make all of us work much harder plus it would expand the market. I might much favour a little slice of a large pie, compared to a big piece of a small pie.’

Those comments differed with ones he made month that is last Global Gaming company. There, he said he had been still against ‘bad actor’ clauses that would ban PokerStars from the marketplace entirely, but said that some penalties were appropriate.

‘ We ought to see the regulators saying they may come in, but because they certainly were taking wagers illegally for those years, you are going to have to suffer a penalty where you can’t run for a given time period,’ Mattingley stated. ‘I think 2 yrs would make some sense…as competitors, I think we ought to be allowed to establish our brands, which could be done in two years.’

No Change in Opinion, States Mattingley

Those seemingly incompatible statements seem to happen clarified within the Bluff interview. He said to Stutz was not included in the LVRJ article in it, Mattingley said that his position has been consistent all along, but that some of what.

According to Mattingley, his statements welcoming PokerStars back to the US markets were followed by a qualifier that is big in which he said ‘…however, I really do believe they got that top rated operating in a market where everyone else had been out.’

‘They really should not be allowed to walk into new states,’ Mattingley told Bluff. He offered up that an exclusion of just one to couple of years would be appropriate and reasonable to all parties, after which PokerStars should be permitted to compete like anyone else.

Packer’s Crown Buys 36-Year Licensing Deal for $847 million

Pleased as punch: James Packer has secured a license that is 36-year the Crown Casino in Melbourne, plus tax concessions on high rollers. (Image: Justin Benson-Cooper/

James Packer’s Crown Casino in Melbourne received a permit extension until 2050 from the Government of the Australian state of Victoria, that has defended its decision to allow for the add-on that is multi-decade. The Victoria national will additionally allow Packer to expand table games and ‘pokie’ (slot) machines in Crown casinos, in return for payments of up to A$910 million (US$847 million).

Politicians and groups that are anti-gambling called the deal ‘grubby’ and ‘back-door,’ and declare that does not have transparency. But Victoria’s treasurer, Michael O’Brien, said that the contract would help investment that is economic jobs.

‘This contract provides significant benefits that are financial’ he said, ‘as well as improved competition and investment certainty for Crown and the 8,800 individuals who work here.’

Crown casino president Packer had been additionally quick to highlight the observed benefits that are economic. He said that, while his company had invested $1.7 billion to upgrade the casino, ‘it had for the time that is long at ‘a major competitive disadvantage on the issue of taxation.

‘Now,’ he added, ‘with the support of the Victorian government, we will have a license that enables us to compete for a level playing field to help drive tourism, jobs and economic benefit for the state.’

Anti-Gambling Backlash

Australian Churches Gambling Taskforce Chairman Rev. Tim Costello ended up being one of many who spoke out against the deal, however.

‘ This whole thing smells,’ he said. ‘This close to an election, why would you are doing a deal without transparency, and with such haste, whenever it has major implications for the public that is victorian? Australia has 20 % of all the world’s pokies, it has the biggest population of problem gamblers in the world, yet it has gone through with no debate or discussion.’

Five future governments, he added, would be bound to your deal. ‘I think people now has a cynicism that is world-weary politicians, and additionally they know massive political contributions get to government from the gambling industry. They want fewer pokies, not a maintenance or increase of current levels.’

Crown said it would expand the amount of pokie machines and gaming tables underneath the deal that is new however the number of pokie device licenses would remain exactly the same, because it could be absorbing current licenses from pubs and clubs. Also, the Victoria federal government also agreed that a ‘super-tax’ will also be removed on all high-rolling VIP players from next year.

Concessions towards the Crown

This last point, stated O’ Brien, will allow Crown to compete with casinos in Macau and Singapore.

‘ This will be a very competitive industry. We want to guarantee that high rollers from overseas find a reason to want to come calmly to Melbourne to invest their funds,’ the treasurer noted.

But, Deakin University gambling researcher and expert Professor Linda Hancock questioned the logic behind this.

‘ I see no good reason why the government should be offering any concessions to Crown, it’s quite crazy really,’ she said. ‘Crown has been systematically under-taxed for years. These types of concessions and deals should really be part of an election platform and should not have now been brokered behind closed doors, but this is a characteristic of gambling policy. The federal government is indeed beholden to the gambling industry, which is offering them this candy to fill government coffers for their election campaign.’

Despite negative publicity, the offer dramatically fortifies the place of Crown Resorts and also this was reflected in the currency markets. Shares in the company rose in the hours following the story initially broke.