Mansion Poker to Keep UK, Other Mansion Items Remain

Mansion Group says that it will be casino that is operating in the UK, but the business’s poker providing will be closed this thirty days.

Although Mansion Poker is shipping out of the British market that is online Mansion Group is far through the only operator to balk at the new income tax regime that the uk is implementing for online gambling. This is exactly why most people believed it whenever reports surfaced that the firm was planning for a full withdrawal from great britain market. It turns out that those reports may have been a bit premature, though one or more Mansion item will soon become unavailable to customers that are british.

The Mansion Group released a statement on Wednesday doubting reports that they are making the united kingdom market, rather saying that they are in the process to gain an online gambling license under the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act. However, this process will not consist of the group’s online poker room, that will be closing down on today, September 15.

All Casino Sites to Remain Open

‘In contrast to recent reports, Mansion Group wish to verify that none of the casino that is online in their portfolio;,,, and, will be exiting the UK market,’ read a statement from the Mansion Group. ‘Business in Mansion Group casino brands will carry on as usual during the UK licence application process.’

However, the statement did confirm that the poker room will be closing, plus an e-mail to UK players offered customers instructions on how to continue.

Poker Players Advised to Change Sites

‘Due to changing regulations regarding online video gaming in the United Kingdom, we must inform you that Mansion Poker is needed to close its doorways to UK players on September 15th, 2014,’ the e-mail read. ‘As a result, we kindly request you have in your Mansion Poker account. which you withdraw any and all sorts of funds’

Players were encouraged to move their reports to Titanbet Poker. The email said that players could transfer their loyalty rewards to the Titanbet site.

In the case of the Mansion Group, the closing for the poker room is a minor event: within the team’s statement, they talked about that it ‘accounts for the very marginal part of Mansion Group.’ but, it is unlikely that this may be the only casualty in the UK market as a result of the latest laws taking hold there.

Firms Considering New Tax Rates, Regulatory Requirements

Under the new laws, any business that wishes to offer online gambling services in the UK must use for a license. They will additionally be at the mercy of a 15 per cent point-of-consumption tax that will affect any gambling carried out by UK residents. This means a much higher taxation rate for companies situated in jurisdictions such as Gibraltar therefore the Isle of Man. Operators will also be scrutinized over their worldwide operations, with poker operators being anticipated to ensure that identity checks are consistent across shared networks.

These and other provisions have already chased some operators out of industry, particularly those with limited player bases in the UK. According to SBOBet, a business based in the Isle of Man, all records at their sites are closed by September 15, with all account balances refunded by the end associated with the month. 12BET will also be closing its online recreations guide in great britain by the end of September, though it’ll still run its casino web site.

Singapore Pushes for Online Gambling Limitations

Despite being one of those many gambling that is prolific in the world, Singapore is considering online gambling restrictions. (Image:

Singapore is already known for having strict laws that are designed to curb social ills, so you might be surprised to find that the city-state does not yet have any regulations for online gambling. But that’s about to change, as a bill that is new remote video gaming has been look over within the Singapore parliament and promises sweeping limitations on the industry.

The bill that is new known whilst the Remote Gambling Bill, was introduced a week ago and would largely ban remote gambling (including online gambling and betting by phone or other similar means) for both local and foreign operators. The bill would authorize the government to need online companies to block unauthorized online gambling websites, aswell as force banks as well as other financial institutions to block payments to and from such web sites.

Gambling Sites Would Join Existing Blacklist

Blocking websites is nothing new for Singapore, which already restricts access to around 100 web sites in the country. During the moment, that blacklist mostly covers sites that component hateful, extreme, or pornographic materials, and also famously includes dating internet site Ashley Madison.

The new bill would criminalize a range of activities related to online gambling. It would be illegal for firms to offer such games to Singaporeans, with companies breaking that law being fined as much as SIN$500,000 ($400,000). Senior staff members at firms running these web sites could also face jail time. These laws apply both to operators that are foreign those located in Singapore.

Advertising to youth or allowing minors access to internet sites is also included as an offense that carries a fine of SIN$300,000 ($240,000) and as much as six years in prison. Other fines could be levied to promote gambling that is remote Singapore residents. Individuals who gamble online could also be targeted with fines or up to six months of jail time.

Some Companies Could Receive Exemptions

However, the law that is new maybe not be a total ban in its current type. The bill does enable operators to apply for an exemption to the ban, which would enable them to keep (or start) offering remote gambling services in Singapore. Nevertheless, this exemption will probably only be available to local organizations that are non-profit have actually currently proven that they have a track record of complying with legal criteria.

Federal Government officials say that these regulations that are tight built to protect those many apt to be harmed by on line gambling.

‘The objectives for managing remote gambling are to maintain law and order and protect young persons along with other vulnerable persons from being harmed or exploited by remote gambling,’ the Ministry of Home Affairs said in a statement.

Some specialists have actually questions as to just how effective these measures are in stopping Singaporeans from accessing gambling internet sites. In the end, it may just come down to just how badly a given person wants to play.

‘I believe blocking will at least keep out those gamblers that are casual those that just opportunity upon the internet sites,’ stated Alfred Siew, editor of Techgoondu, a technology website. ‘he will discover a way to access it. if it is pornography or any other type of objectionable content, in the event that individual is hardcore enough,’

The bill comes after a six-week consultation that is public in which numerous groups, including some in the gambling industry, had input into the legislation. Reportedly, the online gambling market in Singapore is reported to be well worth about $416 million, with 95 percent of that total currently being spent at foreign sites.

Marty Walsh Slams MA Commissioners for Anti-Boston Bias

Boston Mayor Marty Walsh says the Massachusetts Gaming Commission is biased against their city in regards to casino site selection. (Image: Arthur Pollock/

The Massachusetts casino battle has placed Boston Mayor Marty Walsh in a position that is unusual. He has simultaneously battled against allowing potential nearby casinos, whilst also trying getting the greatest feasible deal for his city if one ultimately is made. Through the entire process, Walsh has additionally had an abundance of criticism for the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, in which he fired away at them once again last week.

Walsh accused the commission’s acting president of holding a bias up against the populous city of Boston, and said that the board as a whole has been illegally manipulating the casino licensing process. The accusations come at a time that is sensitive as the commission is currently debating whether or not to honor the sole Greater Boston area permit up to a Wynn development in Everett or perhaps a competing proposal for a Mohegan Sun casino at Suffolk Downs in Revere.

Walsh Accuses McHugh of Making Biased Statements

‘In the City’s view, the Commission has improperly manipulated the gaming licensing procedure by ignoring and violating the mandates of the Gaming Act…which requires the Commissioners to ‘conduct themselves in a manner so as to render decisions that are fair and impartial and into the public interest,” Walsh wrote in a page to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. ‘The Commission has displayed clear bias against the City of Boston in its decision-making and public statements.’

In the page, Walsh singled down comments by acting chairman James McHugh, whom made a statement that Walsh ‘abandoned’ the Charlestown community by selecting not to participating in arbitration with Wynn over compensation for their casino task. He also said that McHugh played a role that is major stopping Boston from getting host community status for the 2 casino proposals, which would have provided the city veto power on the projects.

Walsh in addition has questioned statements made by McHugh in regards to your upcoming vote on awarding the casino license. With board chairman Stephen Crosby having recused himself from the process, there are only four members left, meaning it is possible that the vote could end in a 2-2 tie between the Wynn and Mohegan tasks. But McHugh has already said he’s confident that won’t happen, which Walsh finds suspicious.

‘For a commissioner whom is not likely to understand exactly what the near future of video gaming is within the Boston region, he’s making general public statements that he knows it will not be a tie,’ Walsh told the Boston world.

Commission Rejects Accusations

The commission has soundly refused Walsh’s charges, saying that they’ve been really careful to make certain that Boston’s interests have been protected through the process.

‘The commission firmly rejects false accusations of bias and remains fully committed to protecting the integrity associated with the process,’ said spokesperson Elaine Driscoll in a statement.

A week ago, the commission released their reports on the two plans vying for the Boston-area casino license. Overall, the panel seemed to enjoy a preference that is slight the Wynn’s plan, due in big part to the fact that the Everett resort were more ambitious. However, there were also razor- sharp criticisms on what they deemed to be a less-than-thrilling project design.

Meanwhile, the panel felt that the Mohegan Sun proposal in Revere ended up being geared more towards attracting Boston-area customers without encroaching on its existing Connecticut customer base. The Wynn also scored better in financing and economic benefits, while Mohegan won points because of their design and the direction they have handled the impact that is local casino might have.